Independent reference. We are independent of every vendor listed. No affiliate links. No sponsored placements.
Quote-only vs quote-only

Sierra vs Decagon Cost Comparison 2026 (Both Quote-Only)

With both vendors quote only, what is publicly known and how should a buyer compare them?

Headline answer

Both are top-tier CX-agent specialists with no published rate. Sierra emphasises outcome-based per-resolution pricing in marketing; Decagon publishes neither a rate nor a pricing page. Compare them by running the same RFP against both, asking each for cost per resolved case at your forecast volume.

Side by side

Vendor page

Sierra

Sierra AI: quote only. Markets outcome-based per-resolution pricing. Founded by former Salesforce CEO Bret Taylor.

Where Sierra wins

  • Strong outcome-based marketing posture
  • Forward-deployed engineer model in many deals
  • Branding wins large logos in retail and travel
Sierra pricing →
Vendor page

Decagon

Decagon AI: quote only. No published rate or pricing page; ask whether the unit is the conversation or the resolution.

Where Decagon wins

  • Per-conversation and per-resolution units can both be put on the table
  • Active in fintech and e-commerce buying motions
Decagon pricing →

Feature heatmap

Green = included on the cheapest published plan. Amber = partial or add-on. Red = not included. Grey = quote only, cannot confirm.

FeatureSierraDecagon
Published rate✗✗
Outcome-based unit explicitly marketed✓◐
Forward-deployed engineer model✓✓
Self-serve trial path✗✗

Side-by-side quote playbook

Run identical RFPs against both vendors, hold all variables constant (resolution definition, conversation volume, SLA, channels), and ask each for fully-loaded cost per resolved case at your forecast volume. If one quotes outcome-based and the other quotes annual-platform-plus-usage, ask both to normalise to cost-per-resolution at your projected resolution rate. Refuse to sign without a side-by-side normalisation table.

Switching cost

Direct answer

If you are on the wrong one

Switching CX-agent vendors is dominated by the integration layer (knowledge base ingestion, CRM connectors, action APIs) rather than the agent runtime. Plan 8 to 12 weeks for a swap once contracts are signed.

Direct answer

How to validate before signing

Run a fixed test corpus across both vendors for at least 30 days, log per-interaction cost in both systems, and confirm the unit of billing (conversation, resolution, message, task) matches your accounting model before committing to an annual deal.

Verification date shown per vendor row