Independent reference. We are independent of every vendor listed. No affiliate links. No sponsored placements.
General-purpose vs coding

Manus vs Devin Cost Comparison 2026

Which costs less for general-purpose agentic work at small, mid and heavy volumes?

Headline answer

Same $20 entry price, different jobs. Manus wins on general research / ops / data workflows metered in credits. Devin wins on coding-specific tasks that benefit from work-tracker integration. Pick by the workload, not the price.

Side by side

Vendor page

Manus

Manus is a credit-metered general-purpose agent: $20 a month buys 4,000 credits plus 300 refresh credits a day. Manus does not publish a credit cost per task type.

Where Manus wins

  • General-purpose: research, data, ops, browsing, document workflows
  • 300 refresh credits a day on every paid plan
  • Single credit unit across task types
Manus pricing →
Vendor page

Devin

Devin is a coding-specific managed agent: Pro $20 with quota, Max $200 with significantly higher quota, plus overage at underlying frontier-model API rates.

Where Devin wins

  • Coding-specific: ticket-to-PR pipeline
  • Tight work-tracker integration
  • Frontier-model agnostic (OpenAI / Claude / Gemini)
Devin pricing →

Feature heatmap

Green = included on the cheapest published plan. Amber = partial or add-on. Red = not included. Grey = quote only, cannot confirm.

FeatureManusDevin
Coding-agent specialisation✗✓
General-purpose task variety✓◐
Credit-based metering✓◐
Work-tracker integration✗✓
Concurrent tasks at Starter✗✗

Per-task cost ledgers (illustrative example, not a real company)

50 deep-research tasks / month on Manus
01$20 plan included credits
4,000
02Assumed 80 credits per task x 50
4,000 used
03$20 plan monthly
$20
Cost per task~$0.40
50 coding tasks / month on Devin Pro
01Pro plan monthly
$20
02Within Pro quota at light volume
Included
Cost per task~$0.40

Switching cost

Direct answer

If you are on the wrong one

These are different products with overlapping price points. Switching is a workload decision, not a cost decision. A team using Manus for coding work usually finds Devin cheaper per merged PR; a team using Devin for non-coding research finds Manus cheaper per finished research deliverable.

Direct answer

How to validate before signing

Run a fixed test corpus across both vendors for at least 30 days, log per-interaction cost in both systems, and confirm the unit of billing (conversation, resolution, message, task) matches your accounting model before committing to an annual deal.

Verification date shown per vendor row